Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator

(antigravity.google)

44 points | by jonbaer 1 hour ago

6 comments

  • vegardx 2 minutes ago
    This is essentially what Anthropic does with the advisor mode and what GitHub does with their multi-model pipeline using the HydraFusion model, which is just a large set of different models with different qualities used in a pipeline to produce an answer.

    What I don't understand is how they all make it work with caching in general. Looking at how the advisor mode in claude work you seem to only be billed the output tokens and cache hit on the whole session when it calls out to the advisor, making it super cheap compared to running the more expensive model for the entire session.

  • fuussssip 14 minutes ago
    I'm really curious how folks feel about this. I regularly use subagents, but typically make my primary implementation agent use Carbon (or equivalent).

    I set up my subagents with specific models based on how complex I believe the problem space is. I'm nervous to delegate that authority to a model (since models tend to be... optimistic about their capabilities.)

    That said, not every coding task is a difficult coding task. Plenty are boilerplate, plumbing, or simple test authoring that could use a flash model, so maybe this would downgrade nicely.

    On the other hand, it's trivial for me to set up some guidelines to create different subagents for different task domains, and just pin those models to those tasks -- implementor (hard) and implementor (easy) or whatever.

  • fmind-dev 22 minutes ago
    Excellent mode! I don't have to constantly switch between models and efforts.
  • gnabgib 58 minutes ago
    Discussion on the front page (191 points, 121 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50471431
    • thehamkercat 41 minutes ago
      Not the same article, this one has orchestrator and some antigravity stuff
  • jonplackett 1 minute ago
    And I thought OpenAI’s name scheme was confusing.
  • cloverich 25 minutes ago
    [dead]