12 comments

  • cmiles8 31 minutes ago
    Is anyone keeping track of all these “partnerships” and “investments” in one place? This is all turning into a ton of what looks like PR fodder that appears to go nowhere.
    • enugu 14 minutes ago
      This doesn't seem to be investment focussed activity, but rather extending Claude credits for education and research. Which is a good thing, independent of other bad things that might be happening.
      • colechristensen 13 minutes ago
        And a sizable tax deduction.
        • yreg 4 minutes ago
          Who profits from that deduction and how?
    • romaniv 23 minutes ago
      Ed Zitron[1] has a lot of articles and podcast episodes on these deals. The nice thing about it is that he occasionally revisits the old announcements to check what happened with them. Apparently a lot of these deals just evaporate after prolonged contact with reality.

      [1] https://www.wheresyoured.at/

    • giancarlostoro 19 minutes ago
      Compared to the insanely circular deals that OpenAI made? I have slight more confidence in Anthropics partnerships honestly. This is the Gates foundation dropping 200 million for use of Claude for medical research, unlike OpenaAIs weird "we will buy stuff off you in the future" but I don't know that they actually ever have or did.
    • georgemcbay 14 minutes ago
      A lot of the recent news just makes me think much worse of Anthropic.

      If you're going to partner with a charitable Gates, choose the good one (though to be fair, she's probably going to be far more discerning).

      And Anthropic's decision to become complicit in poisoning Memphis with Grok's methane turbines already put the lie to the idea they are the conscientious ones when it comes to large AI companies.

  • podgietaru 25 minutes ago
    Bill Gates, famous climate activist? Mmm.
    • ZeroGravitas 15 minutes ago
      He spent most of that effort undermining proven solutions and propping up his own investments which have a poor record so this is not out of character.
      • shimman 9 minutes ago
        Let's also not forget his wife divorcing him over his Epstein partying.
    • dev_l1x_be 21 minutes ago
      The helped easing up on the resources of Earth with his investment in certain pharma companies and now owns a giant amount of the farmland of the US too.
      • giancarlostoro 16 minutes ago
        > now owns a giant amount of the farmland of the US too.

        What for though? I always hear this, but what's the point of it?

    • kennywinker 8 minutes ago
      Don’t forget: friend of notorious pedophile jeffery epstein.
      • AndrewKemendo 6 minutes ago
        Not just friend

        He actively abused trafficked women including non-consensually exposing his wife to an STI

        These are the worst people on the planet and should be dissected while living and live-streamed as an example to others

  • shevy-java 6 minutes ago
    Evil & Evil unite.

    To explain: first, they did not pay proper taxes, in particular the older Evil here. But even more importantly, in the USA a foundation can own patents, among other things. They need to give out a certain % on a yearly basis, but basically it is a corporation.

  • barbarr 40 minutes ago
    So... Does the Gates foundation get an equity stake?
  • amelius 26 minutes ago
    Gates missed the boat with the internet. This is not going to happen a second time!
    • icedchai 12 minutes ago
      They were a little late, but did have the dominant browser for most of the 2000's. To say they "missed the boat" is a bit much. There was a dark period from 1999 to 2004 or so where IE was basically the only usable browser.
      • chrisrickard 7 minutes ago
        … i’m still seeing a therapist about this time period.
  • Fokamul 35 minutes ago
    Pedos Foundation
  • hiroto_lemon 2 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • throwaway613746 12 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • lorecore 37 minutes ago
    [flagged]
    • Fokamul 34 minutes ago
      Because it's the same people.
  • kennywinker 4 minutes ago
    The gates foundation: money laundering and influence purchasing for billionaires who occasionally want to slip their wives antibiotics.
  • sowbug 10 minutes ago
    Is that $200M with the prompt cache at five minutes, or one hour?